Comments on: Superior Court expects Britney Spears next Friday

By: Carmela Kelly

Carmela Kelly — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:54:04 +0000

…what they had seen…

And it was not enough for a story on it’s own.

Rough draft Courier font defies me.

By: Carmela Kelly

Carmela Kelly — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:52:37 +0000

You are right, Le. Of course, but to cover the story I wanted to talk to people who might have been physically there. There is talk and disbelief in the blogosphere that she actually showed. The paparazzi got pics of her standard white Escalade that has three rows of seats but Britney and her dad were not there.

The event was on Friday. Are the paparazzi failing at their talent? X17 reported live .. they had a camera outside the courthouse and as pedestrians passed by they relayed what they had scene to them. Yes, she was there, yes she was dressed up. I don’t trust any of them (Britney or her team have created ruses in the past) and I want to hear it from someone in the court house.

The weekend was not advantageous to following up with credible sources. I did talk to some people on Friday afternoon but … it was enough for a story on its own.

By: Le Templar

Le Templar — Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:57:25 +0000

Hi Carmela!
Good to see you on Friday. As I said, I’m catching up on everyone’s blogs again. I thought this one was good. But what happened on Friday, Jan. 22? Did the court hearing occur? Was Spears there? Your readers want to know and it would be a good idea to get a new post up with what you know as quickly as possible.

Thanks,
Le Templar
PVCC Puma Press blogs adviser

By: Blog Highlights Week 1 « Highlights of the Puma Press Blogs

Blog Highlights Week 1 « Highlights of the Puma Press Blogs — Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:59:04 +0000

[...] Fair News Spears: Superior Court Expects Britney Spears Next Friday [...]

By: Carmela Kelly

Carmela Kelly — Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:00:01 +0000

Hi, Mike. Good to see you. It’s a question many have asked and then many were lead to believe (by TMZ) that she would be freed after the tour in Australia.

I wish that the Associated Press would have covered the courthouse last week and informed the world that there was a misunderstanding as to Spears’appearance or lack there of. In the void the “world” believes Spears skipped the hearing to go shopping instead and have her nails done.

In the void, Wenn did a particularly nice job of pinning the mishap on Spears. Wenn quoted two statements made by TMZ but wove them together to make it “clear” that TMZ had “accurately” reported that the cause was the media scare and that the parties had agreed: but the judge didn’t see it that way.

Thanks for caring, Mike.

By: Mike Cann

Mike Cann — Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:09:29 +0000

Such a weird case. Because how can one not be fit to take care of their affairs but then be sent on a world tour? Touring which has lead to to many to count early deaths. Doesn’t make much sense but to make $? What a world we live in. Getting paid comes first? Seems that way.

By: Carmela Kelly

Carmela Kelly — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 19:39:21 +0000

Hopefully she can regain control over her personal stuff and her money.

Mary. Sorry to be a cynic but … I think Britney’s case sets a precedent.

If she gets control over her personal stuff how soon can she regain custody? Does her team really know best?

By: Michelle

Michelle — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 14:45:21 +0000

hopefully she can regain control of her personal stuff

By: Mary

Mary — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 11:05:00 +0000

There’s nothing to worry. Britney and her team know what they are doing. If it is best for her to regain the control of her personal stuff, then she will regain her control. IF It is not, then things will remain the way it is.