As to the Cobain girl she should get her mother’s name off of her trust account as soon as possible; the money is for her – not momma. Believe me, I know what I’m talking about. I’ve been involved in guardianship battles for years. Please contact me. unneededguardianships@yahoo.com

Don’t you think it’s strange that the conservatorship was made permanent in October 2008 on the same day Johnny Wright’s attorney was trying to compel Britney to testify?

What I would like to ask the court is what steps the court might take to hear Britney’s side and I mean BRITNEY’S SIDE. She has tried to hire four attorneys now and she’s still … If I were the Hon. Goetz (why isn’t there more political pressure on her?) I would want to see Britney alone or make some measure to get her side outside and away from Jamie, Sam Ingham, and the lot of hem.

I hope that celebrities will inquire themselves, speak up, put some pressure on the judge to answer more of our questions. Do you know what I mean?

I find it horrifying that a productive money maker who goes to work, tour, performs and so on, could still be under a conservatorship the way that it has been. Maybe she wants out so bad that they are afraid to give her even little bits of freedom.

Is staying in the same hotel with Jason Trawick freedom? Who else stays with them there? What about her new home? Is it far away from where she needs to do business right now? X17 etc. keeps saying they’ve been going out on pointless drives but the public can see dry cleaning in the back of the car… we’re only getting parts of the story.

I’ll try to be productive this week when I get back and try to get more answers. I ask myself why mainstream media isn’t asking these questions and chasing the story. There’s an obvious public interest. Britney Spears and what is happening with the conservatorship is newsworthy. TMZ meanwhile profits from the opportunity of mainstream media ignoring the case in the way they have. I’m not making profit here. I haven’t even tried to but I have questions like you do and now as a journalist student I have the right to try to get some of those questions answered and then inform the public.

what i dont underatnd is why is she working how can somebody be allowed t work yet not be able to take care of themself shouldne c-ship prevent her formgoing in the same world she fell apart in in the forst plase
yes i knwo its her comfor zone but still…..its pressure and she shouldbe allowed to work if she is under c-ship

Why would anyone believe Harvey Levin at this point? He’s lost credibility to me over the year. For example, I read a story that Britney is going to the crazy side and that she’s been showing signs of craziness through her frantic, compulsive shopping. I make a few calls and find out it isn’t so and that Harvey’s tale is false.

About permanent c-ship.

There’s no motion to terminate. There’s no “continuing” what a judge has ruled to be permanent: no more regularly scheduled conservatorship reviews.

We were told by the media that Britney could terminate it at any time. So… it’s permanent from the sense of reviewing the c-ship to see whether to continue it or make other arrangements.

I would like to see someone who doesn’t have a monetary interest in Britney be the one to determine capacity. How can Britney have a voice when her court-appointed voice continues to have a job that rewards him to be “without capacity?”

Why in 2008 and 2009 did various lawyers from the conservatorship continue to use a ruling from Feb. 4, 2008 to prevent Britney from either hiring her own attorney and/or to testify in a court of law?

It was b.s. that her defense lawyer, Michael Flanagan, asked her dad “during the proceedings” if he would allow her to testify during the driver’s license case. That was a sham as court records reveal. I have signed documents as well as the actual court transcript “from the proceedings.”

Which lawyer involved in the conservatorship would talk to the likes of Harvey Levin about such a sensitive matter as someone’s mental health and what the plans are?

Harvey’s site is loaded with ads and Britney had been a gold maker for TMZ since its inception. Google Harvey and CNN transcripts and you will find him saying so repeatedly. He could drag out this c-ship thing over this year which I guess is what he intends to do. He got all of our hits to his site and generated ad revenue by being near the only one to breathe any trace of information regarding the conservatorship or Britney’s mental health.

There are still enough nuts out there to disbelieve my interview with two witnesses from the boutique where Britney was shopping was mislead because the sales assistants saw an opportunity to build business for the store? Those nuts want to believe and willingly promote across the blogosphere that Britney could snap at any time.

Ultimately it’s up to your own observation about TMZ to determine who might be telling the truth.

I’ve been researching and writing an article to expose or prove the lack of a court appointed investigator looking in on Britney and being able to talk to her without her being intimidated or influenced by anyone. Those conservatees that are under professional, trained and certified fiduciaries are visited once a year by a court appointed investigator. What about Britney?

Being manipulated by the media is a large part of why I began this column. I wanted to know the truth and I wanted to know if she was okay.

We’re in to what appears to be four attorneys she has tried to hire now. Blair Berk herself testified in April that Britney was constantly asking her why she couldn’t represent her and Berk old her to see her psychiatrist and that she should listen and talk to Sam Ingham. In short Berk admitted that Britney complained about her both to her and to others.

I think the public would be happier if information came from sources outside of the tabloid world. Harvey can pretend to walk among us as an ethical journalist but he is not simply because he doesn’t uphold the truth or hold others who are in power accountable. He’s a tabloid journalist and so is his team of writers. He could try to sue me for libel in saying that but he would fail. Also, if he did try that I could expose him for everyone to see: my articles are easily fact checked. TMZ by the way is only the tip of it. They just never had anyone dog them before quite like this in so public a case: a worldwide superstar.

If you read between the lines of what both Radaronline and TMZ reported…